ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Supramaximal interval training using anaerobic speed reserve or sprint interval training in rowers.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the consistency of physiological adaptations and inter-individual variability in response to three distinct high-intensity interval training (HIIT) protocols-anaerobic power reserve (APR), maximal aerobic power (MAP), and sprint interval training (SIT)-among elite male rowers. By exploring the impact of individualized intensity prescriptions, we sought to identify the most effective protocol for enhancing training consistency, as well as improving both aerobic and anaerobic performance while minimizing variability in individual responses. Methods: Thirty well-trained male rowers (mean age: 24.9 ± 3.1 years; height: 185 ± 4.4 cm; body mass: 86 ± 7.9 kg; body fat: 12.5% ± 2.4%) participated in the study. All participants were members of a national rowing team with an average of 6 years of competitive experience and regular participation in national and international championships. The intervention involved 6 weeks of individualized HIIT, performed three times per week, with pre- and post-tests assessing VO Results: All interventions resulted in significant improvements in VO Conclusion: The SIT protocol, emphasizing maximal exertion, led to the most consistent adaptations and the greatest improvements across key performance metrics, including VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.