ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Embryological and pregnancy outcomes of IVF-ET in overweight/obese and normal-weight women with PCOS.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reevaluating statistical methods for proportion-based laboratory outcomes in assisted reproduction.Journal of ovarian research · 2026Review
- Irisin and endocrine-metabolic indicators as predictors of IVF-ET pregnancy outcomes in Chinese women with PCOS.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Clinical significance of microRNA-30d-5p and TGF-β/Smad2 pathway expression levels in polycystic ovary syndrome patients.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- PTX3 as a key modulator of functional ovarian response in PCOS: evaluation alongside TSG-6 and ITI.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Female obesity has been conclusively associated with compromised fertility, adverse pregnancy outcomes and higher risks of obstetric and neonatal complications. However, it remains unclear whether the adverse outcomes observed in IVF treatments among women with obesity are primarily due to obesity itself or to underlying pathologies such as PCOS. Studies investigating the impact of overweight/obesity compared to normal weight in women with PCOS have yielded inconsistent findings. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 4083 women with PCOS undergoing the first IVF-ET cycle with antagonist protocol. Among them, 1755 were divided into the normal weight group (18.5 g/m Result: Women with overweight and obese had fewer numbers of oocytes retrieved (adjusted B: -0.82 [-1.17 to -0.47] and adjusted B: -1.86 [-2.26 to -1.46], respectively), numbers of 2PN (adjusted B: -0.52 [-0.78 to -0.26] and adjusted B: -1.86 [-2.26 to -1.46]), and numbers of good-quality embryos (adjusted B: -0.34 [-0.57 to -0.12] and adjusted B: -0.88 [-1.13 to -0.62]), compared to the women with normal weight. The live birth rate was 35.7%, 30.6% and 27.2% in the normal weight group, the overweight group and obese group, respectively (adjusted OR:0.76 [0.65 to 0.89]) for overweight verse normal weight, and adjusted OR:0.64 [0.53 to 0.76)] for obese verse normal weight). There were significant associations between higher BMI and adverse outcomes. We did not observe significant non-linear associations between BMI and these outcomes. Discussion: Overweight or obese women with PCOS undergoing IVF-ET experienced lower numbers of oocytes and good quality embryos, reduced rates of live births, and higher rates of miscarriage compared to normal-weight women with PCOS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.