ArticleSmall science2025
Ultrasound-Responsive Polymeric Piezoelectric Nanoparticles for Remote Activation and Neuronal Differentiation of Human Neural Stem Cells.
Article in Small science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polydopamine Nanotubes: Multifunctional Smart Nanotransducers for Cellular Activity Modulation.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Smart Nanotechnologies for Multimodal Neuromodulation and Brain Interfacing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Ultrasound-Activated Biodegradable Piezoelectric Chitosan Nanoparticles for Glioblastoma Treatment.Small science · 2026Article
- Electrospinning for Mimicking Bioelectric Microenvironment in Tissue Regeneration.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The regenerative capacity of the central nervous system (CNS) is limited. Understanding and enhancing the mechanisms that induce neural differentiation of neural stem cells (NSCs) is crucial for advancing regenerative medicine; one significant challenge in this effort is the remote delivery of pro-differentiation cues. In this framework, a nanotechnology-based solution able to remotely trigger the differentiation of human NSCs (hNSCs) into neurons is proposed. The approach involves organic piezoelectric nanotransducers, which can be remotely activated by low-intensity ultrasound (US) for local and noninvasive electrical stimulation. Highly biocompatible piezoelectric polymeric nanoparticles, when activated by US, demonstrate the ability to induce calcium influx, exit from the cell cycle, and neuronal differentiation in hNSCs, as evidenced by calcium imaging experiments and the expression analysis of the NeuN post-mitotic neural marker; additionally, an increased outgrowth of the developing axons is observed. Gene expression analysis moreover suggests that the neural differentiation mechanism induced by piezoelectric stimulation acts by upregulating the calcium signaling-sensitive NeuroD1 neural inducer and the Lamb1 marker, independently of the c-Jun/c-Fos pathway. Considering the high biocompatibility and the good piezoelectricity of the polymeric nanotransducers used in this work, it is believed that this "wireless" stimulation approach holds high potential in CNS regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.