Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40213061›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in surgery2025

Nasal valve obstruction: a comprehensive analysis of the current literature and proposal of a management algorithm.

Francesca Pirola, Raymond Kim, Richard Douglas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Francesca PirolaORL Department, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand.
Raymond KimDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Richard DouglasDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal valve obstruction (NVO) remains challenging to diagnose and treat. This review explores the persisting controversies of NVO management, emphasising the lack of consensus in diagnostic criteria and treatment protocols among otolaryngologists and facial plastic surgeons. Recent surveys highlight the central dilemma: for many patients who have both septal deviation and NVO, a septoplasty alone provides adequate symptomatic improvement. However, some with this combination of problems continue to be troubled by nasal obstruction if only a septoplasty is performed. This underscores the critical question of when NVO necessitates specific surgical intervention. The varying diagnostic approaches that have been used and the limited outcome data currently available conspire to make this question difficult to answer with certainty. This review will also address the role of the inferior turbinates in NVO management, proposing their inclusion in NVO surgical planning. Other techniques will also be discussed for their potential impact on nasal valve dynamics. Both endonasal and open approaches to correcting the caudal septum need to be considered when discussing NVO repair. A treatment algorithm for NVO will be presented as a practical guide for the management of this condition.

Indexed as

nasal obstructionnasal obstruction measurementnasal valvenasal valve repairvalve collapse

Identifiers

PMID40213061
PMCPMC11983596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.