ArticleSmall science2022
Functional Ink Formulation for Printing and Coating of Graphene and Other 2D Materials: Challenges and Solutions.
Article in Small science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Printable van der Waals Nanoparticles for Additive Technologies.Nano letters · 2026Article
- Nanomaterial-Based Inkjet Printing for Electrochemical Sensing.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- Development of a Gold Nanoparticle Dispersion for Plasma Jet Printing on Solid Substrates.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in 2D materials for wearable biomonitoring.Materials science & engineering. R, Reports : a review journal · 2025Article
- Highly conductive, conformable ionic laser-induced graphene electrodes for flexible iontronic devices.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Liquid Shear Exfoliation of MoSNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Bioadhesive Gauze Embedded with Chitosan-Butein Bioconjugate: A Redox-Active pH Sensor Platform.Biosensors · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The properties of 2D materials are unparalleled when compared to their 3D counterparts; many of these properties are a consequence of their size reduction to only a couple of atomic layers. Metallic, semiconducting, and insulating types can be found and form a platform for a new generation of devices. Among the possible methods to utilize 2D materials, functional printing has emerged as a strong contender because inks can be directly formulated from dispersions obtained by liquid-phase exfoliation. Printed graphene-based devices are shifting from laboratory applications toward real-world and mass-producible systems going hand in hand with a good understanding of suitable exfoliation methods for the targeted type of ink. Such a clear picture does not yet exist for hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN), the transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), and black phosphorous (BP). Rather, reports of applications of these 2D materials in printed devices are scattered throughout the literature, not yet adding to a comprehensive and full understanding of the relevant parameters. This perspective starts with a summary of the most important features of inks from exfoliated graphene. For h-BN, the TMDs, and BP, the characteristic properties when exfoliated from solution and strategies to formulate inks are summarized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.