ArticleBiodiversity data journal2025
A dataset of the abundance of
Article in Biodiversity data journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In Europe, New information: The TELETIQ project (https://teletiq.clermont.hub.inrae.fr/) was interested in mobile phone and participatory science data for the estimation and understanding of the risk of transmission of environmental diseases with an application to diseases transmitted by ticks. It aimed to explore how data from information and communication technologies can be used to improve the estimation and understanding of the risk of transmission of diseases related to the environment. As part of this project, questing ticks were sampled in the field in 15 sites located in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Region (France). We designed an innovative protocol that combined three months of sampling (to include the time of peak tick activity), two transects for each site (to increase statistical power) and the removal sampling method (to take account of the variation in the sampling rate due to ground vegetation). A sampling protocol was designed to collect ticks using the cloth-dragging method. In each site, sampling was conducted along two transects, with ten sub-transects (ST) per transect. Each sub-transect was subjected to three successive rounds of sampling per month, from April to June, 2018. Based on this, we created a dataset of questing tick abundance and information on local environmental conditions. Over the three months of sampling, 2,274 questing ticks were captured across the 15 sites. This total included 2,205 questing nymphs, 30 questing adult females and 39 questing adult males.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.