Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212950›Full record

ArticleEnvironment systems & decisions2024

Positioning nanotechnology to address climate change.

Jacob L Jones, David M Berube, Maude Cuchiara, Khara Grieger, Elaine A Cohen Hubal, Sarah J Karikó, Phillip Strader, Yves Theriault

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environment systems & decisions, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jacob L JonesDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9182-0957
David M BerubeDepartment of Communication, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6751-0417
Maude CuchiaraDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8493-6620
Khara GriegerNorth Carolina Plant Sciences Initiative, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0821-0534
Elaine A Cohen HubalCenter for Public Health and Environmental Assessment, US EPA, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
Sarah J KarikóDepartment of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Phillip StraderDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27606, USA.
Yves TheriaultQualcomm Institute, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA.ORCID 0009-0003-2784-2590

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of society's most pressing challenges in the twenty-first century is that of climate change. In fact, climate change is seen as the most defining issue of our time as we are witness to an anthropogenic perturbation in geology and earth sciences of global scale. To move forward in this new era, solutions will be sought to both mitigate the effects of climate change (e.g., reduce greenhouse gasses) as well as adapt and build resilience (e.g., improve infrastructure and agriculture to resist damage from extreme weather or floods). The immediacy of the needed solutions dictates that the response must use the full force of society's current knowledge base, science, technology, and innovation. Nanotechnology, an enabling technology that has matured over the past few decades and now considered for general-purpose and mass use, is ideal for addressing climate change and its impacts. To position nanotechnology to address such complex challenges, this Perspective integrates collective insights from a broad range of viewpoints and presents recommendations for how research can be motivated and scoped, organized, and implemented to achieve beneficial outcomes and innovations in the most efficient ways. While this Perspective was created with a focus on the research landscape within the United States, the findings are also relevant in other international contexts. Research that can effectively advance nanotechnology solutions will be use-inspired basic research, incorporate systems-level thinking, apply a convergence research approach, engage stakeholders, and require advanced nanotechnology infrastructure. By illuminating this compelling and complex research topic, this Perspective aims to direct, inform, and accelerate needed actions in the research community to advance nanotechnology solutions for addressing climate change.

Indexed as

Basic researchClimate changeConvergence researchInfrastructureNanotechnology

Identifiers

PMID40212950
PMCPMC11980773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.