Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212903›Full record

ArticleResuscitation plus2025

Post-resuscitation blood pressure management: Effects of different MAP targets on cerebral perfusion and inflammation in a porcine model.

Andreas García Bardon, Jens Kamuf, Alexander Ziebart, Christian Breit, Karsten Sommer, Erik K Hartmann, Maren Paul, Tanghua Liu, Petra Leukel, Victoria Albertsmeier and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Resuscitation plus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Andreas García BardonDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Jens KamufDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Alexander ZiebartDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Christian BreitSection of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Karsten SommerSection of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Erik K HartmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Maren PaulDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Tanghua LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Petra LeukelInstitute of Neuropathology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany.
Victoria AlbertsmeierDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Isra Hale3rd Medical Regiment, Fulwood Barracks, Preston, United Kingdom.
Robert F KelmDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Christoph JänigDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.
Laura Maria SchreiberSection of Medical Physics, Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Willi SchmidbauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Bundeswehr Central Hospital, 56072 Koblenz, Germany.
Serge C ThalDepartment of Anesthesiology, Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Post-resuscitation care aims to optimize organ perfusion while mitigating reperfusion injury following the return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, the optimal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target for neuroprotection remains undefined. This study investigates the impact of different MAP targets on cerebral perfusion and inflammatory responses in a well-established porcine model of cardiac arrest. Methods: Thirty-five anesthetized pigs underwent a standardized protocol of 7 min of ventricular fibrillation, followed by standardized cardiopulmonary resuscitation. ROSC was achieved in 28 animals, which were randomized into three groups based on target MAP levels: LOW (45-55 mmHg), NORMO (60-70 mmHg), and HIGH (80-90 mmHg). MAP was actively controlled and maintained for 8 h. Cerebral perfusion was assessed using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging with arterial spin labeling. Systemic hemodynamic parameters, including cardiac output, were continuously monitored. Inflammatory marker expression in brain, kidney, and intestinal tissues was quantified via real-time PCR. Results: Cerebral perfusion progressively increased in all groups. After 6 h, the HIGH MAP group exhibited significantly higher cerebral blood flow (CBF) compared to the LOW and NORMO MAP groups ( Conclusions: Our findings indicate that high MAP targets enhance cerebral perfusion but concurrently exacerbate neuroinflammation. The observed autoregulatory impairment appears to emerge as a delayed phenomenon following cardiac arrest and ROSC, rather than as a direct consequence of elevated MAP levels. These results underscore the need for individualized blood pressure management strategies post-ROSC, weighing the potential benefits of increased cerebral perfusion against the risk of neuroinflammation.

Indexed as

AutoregulationBlood pressure managementCardiac arrestCerebral perfusionInflammationMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Mean arterial pressure (MAP)Porcine modelPost-resuscitation careReperfusion injury

Identifiers

PMID40212903
PMCPMC11985060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.