SynthesisFrontiers in digital health2025
The gaps and challenges in digital health technology use as perceived by patients: a scoping review and narrative meta-synthesis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Development Boards and Microcontroller Platforms in Sports and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Pooled it
- Determinants and Health Outcomes of Digital Health Literacy in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Self-directed learning of informal caregivers using mobile health: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2025Pooled it
- Digitally supported interprofessional interaction in healthcare-a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Pooled it
- Adherence, Acceptability, and Sexual Health Outcomes of the Odeya App-Based Intervention for Sexual Distress in Women With Endometriosis: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Digital Health Intervention for and Long-Term Health Outcomes of a Divorce Cohort With Linked Danish Data: 5-Year Posttrial Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Trial
- Patient- and Caregiver-Informed Considerations for the Design and Implementation of Generative AI-Supported Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Review
- An evidence gap map of digital health interventions for enhancing patient engagement in healthcare.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Measuring eHealth Literacy in the European Economic Area, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Medication adherence in adolescents: physiological, psychosocial, and clinical perspectives.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Determinants of Digital Health Literacy Among Patients With Serious Mental Illness: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- An Introduction to AI for Clinicians: Tutorial.Interactive journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Navigation, Adoption, and Use of Digital Health Technologies for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Self-Management: Focus Group Study of Patient Experience and Decision-Making.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Engagement with the national electronic health records by people with Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Applying the behavior change wheel to ulcerative colitis self-management: a conceptual closed-loop behavioral support framework.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- SeniorHealth Tracker application to support the elderly: technological innovation leveraging humanisation.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Decoding perceived risks in online healthcare services: a safety-trust model based on grounded theory.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Beyond health economics: economic growth, artificial intelligence, and environmental externalities in shaping life expectancy.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Digital health has revolutionized the landscape of healthcare through personalized care, moving away from the traditional approach of treating symptoms and conditions. Digital devices provide diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness while equipping patients with control over their health and well-being. Although the growth of technology provides unprecedented opportunities, there are also certain issues arising from the use of such technology. This scoping review aimed to explore perceived gaps and challenges in the use of digital technology by patients and meta-synthesize them. Identifying such gaps and challenges will encourage new insights and understanding, leading to evidence-informed policies and practices. Methods: Three electronic databases were searched (Cinahl EBSCO, Pubmed, and Web of Science) for papers published in English between January 2010 and December 2023. A narrative meta-synthesis was performed. The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) 2009 checklist. Results: A total of 345 papers were retrieved and screened, with a noticeable increase in publication numbers after 2015. After the final selection, a total of 28 papers were included in the final meta-synthesis; these were published between 2015 and 2023. A total of 99 individual reports were included in the synthesis of these papers, comprising 25 identified gaps and 74 challenges. Discussion: Our meta-synthesis revealed several gaps and challenges related to patients' use of digital technology in health, including generational differences in digital propensity and deficiencies in the work process. In terms of ethics, the lack of trust in technology and data ownership was highlighted, with the meta-synthesis identifying issues in the realm of disruption of human rights. We, therefore, propose building a model for ethically aligned technology development and acceptance that considers human rights a crucial parameter in the digital healthcare ecosystem.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.