ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Investigating the accuracy of Garmin PPG sensors on differing skin types based on the Fitzpatrick scale: cross-sectional comparison study.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Representation of Different Populations in Studies Assessing the Validity of Consumer Wearable Photoplethysmography-Based Measurements: Scoping Review.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- HEART-Watch: A multimodal physiological dataset from a Google Pixel Watch across different physical states.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Enhancing Physiological Complexity Through Mindfulness: A Wearable-Based Intervention for First Responders and Their Partners.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A multitask Transformer-VAE framework for robust PPG denoising and atrial fibrillation screening.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Decoding menstrual health across the lifespan: a scoping review of digital health tools in research.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Decoding menstrual health across the lifespan: a scoping review of digital health tools in research.npj women's health · 2026Article
- Article
- The Effect of Tattoos on Heart Rate Validity in the Polar Verity Sense Commercial Wearable Device.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Commercial wearable devices, which are often capable of estimating heart rate via photoplethysmography (PPG), are increasingly used in health promotion. In recent years, researchers have investigated whether the accuracy of PPG-measured heart rate varies based on skin pigmentation, focusing particularly on the accuracy of such devices among users with darker skin tones. As such, manufacturers of wearable devices have implemented strategies to improve accuracy. Given the ever-changing nature of the wearable device industry and the important health implications of providing accurate heart rate estimates for all individuals no matter their skin color, studies exploring the impact of pigmentation on PPG accuracy must be regularly replicated. Objective: We aimed to contrast heart rate readings collected via PPG using the Garmin Forerunner 45 in comparison with an electrocardiogram (ECG) during various levels of physical activity across a diverse group of participants representing a range of skin tones. Methods: Heart rate data were collected from adult participants (18-64 years of age) at a single study session using the Garmin Forerunner 45 PPG-equipped smartwatch and the Polar H10 ECG chest strap. Skin tone was self-reported via the Fitzpatrick scale. Each participant completed two 10 min bouts of moderate-intensity walking or jogging separated by a 10 min bout of light walking. Results: A series of mixed ANOVAs indicated no significant interaction between Fitzpatrick score and phase of the activity bout (i.e., rest at the start, first intensity ramp-up phase, first steady-state phase, active rest, second ramp-up phase, and second steady-state phase). Similarly, there was no significant main effect for the Fitzpatrick score, although there was a significant main effect for phase, which was driven by greater ECG-recorded heart rate relative to PPG during the first ramp-up phase. Conclusion: Our findings support prior research demonstrating no significant impact of skin tone on PPG-measured heart rate, with significant differences between PPG- and ECG-measured heart rate emerging during dynamic changes in activity intensity. As commercial heart rate monitoring technology and software continue to evolve, it will be vital to replicate studies investigating the impact of skin tone due to the rapidity with which widely used wearable technologies advance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.