ArticleFrontiers in plant science2025
Deep learning-based target spraying control of weeds in wheat fields at tillering stage.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, a target spraying decision and hysteresis algorithm is designed in conjunction with deep learning, which is deployed on a testbed for validation. The overall scheme of the target spraying control system is first proposed. Then YOLOv5s is lightweighted and improved. Based on this, a target spraying decision and hysteresis algorithm is designed, so that the target spraying system can precisely control the solenoid valve and differentiate spraying according to the distribution of weeds in different areas, and at the same time, successfully solve the operation hysteresis problem between the hardware. Finally, the algorithm was deployed on a testbed and simulated weeds and simulated tillering wheat were selected for bench experiments. Experiments on a dataset of realistic scenarios show that the improved model reduces the GFLOPs (computational complexity) and size by 52.2% and 42.4%, respectively, with mAP and F1 of 91.4% and 85.3%, which is an improvement of 0.2% and 0.8%, respectively, compared to the original model. The results of bench experiments showed that the spraying rate under the speed intervals of 0.3-0.4m/s, 0.4-0.5m/s and 0.5-0.6m/s reached 99.8%, 98.2% and 95.7%, respectively. Therefore, the algorithm can provide excellent spraying accuracy performance for the target spraying system, thus laying a theoretical foundation for the practical application of target spraying.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.