Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212871›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2025

Mechanistic insights and future perspectives of drought stress management in staple crops.

Amir Abdullah Khan, Yong-Feng Wang, Rasheed Akbar, Wardah A Alhoqail

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Signaling by a tyrosine-sulfated peptide balances growth and osmotic stress response in rice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrated Screening Identifies Elite IndigenousLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Wheat Drought Management: A Broader Prospect.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of Drought on Cereals Infected withPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Amir Abdullah KhanSchool of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Yong-Feng WangSchool of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Rasheed AkbarSchool of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Wardah A AlhoqailDepartment of Biology, College of Science in Zulfi, Majmaah University, Al-Majmaah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to extended periods of below-normal rainfall and rising temperatures, drought is a significant global issue for agricultural productivity. Hydrological, agricultural, and meteorological droughts all pose different problems with regard to the availability of water for important crops, which in turn impacts plant development and yield. Depending on the crop species and stage of maturity, drought stress degrades plant metabolism and physiological processes, resulting in decreased growth and yield losses that can range from 30% to 90%. Acclimatization and adaptation are the two basic techniques that plants use to survive drought. Rapid alterations in physiological processes and chemical composition, including modifications to osmotic pressure, root and leaf size, and antioxidant systems, are all part of acclimatization. Xerophytism and succulence are two characteristics that drought-resistant plants have evolved to assist preserve cellular integrity and water balance in water-limited environments. Even with these tactics, the majority of important crops-such as maize, rice, and wheat-remain extremely vulnerable to drought stress. To lessen the effects of drought, researchers have looked into a number of strategies, including both conventional and cutting-edge methods. Conventional techniques, like the application of plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) and morphological modifications, remain essential for improving drought resilience. Recent breakthroughs have provided innovative alternatives such as nanoparticle (NP) treatments and biochar, which enhance plant resilience. Biochar enhances soil moisture retention and nutrient accessibility, whereas nanoparticles augment water absorption and bolster molecular resilience under stress. Furthermore, microbial inoculants such as plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) enhance nutrient and water absorption, facilitating growth in arid conditions. This review examines the impacts of drought stress on three important staple crops, emphasizing both traditional and novel approaches to lessen the consequences of drought. We highlight how combining insights from ecology, biochemistry, molecular biology, and cutting-edge technologies like biochar and nanoparticles can boost agricultural production and plant resistance in water-scarce environments.

Indexed as

drought stresshormonesmajor staple cropsnanoparticlesosmolytesPGPBsustainable solutions

Identifiers

PMID40212871
PMCPMC11982952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.