ArticleSmall science2021
Systematic Analysis of Composition, Interfacial Performance and Effects of Pulmonary Surfactant Preparations on Cellular Uptake and Cytotoxicity of Aerosolized Nanomaterials.
Article in Small science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhaled nucleic acid delivery systems for the treatment of pulmonary interstitial diseases: Challenges and opportunities.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- From Pharmacological Uncertainty to Inhalation Development: An Evidence-Gated Roadmap forDrug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Lung surfactant reducesMicrobiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Nano-in-Microparticles for Aerosol Delivery of Antibiotic-Loaded, Fucose-Derivatized, and Macrophage-Targeted Liposomes to Combat Mycobacterial Infections: In Vitro Deposition, Pulmonary Barrier Interactions, and Targeted Delivery.Advanced healthcare materials · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The interplay of particles with pulmonary surfactant, a lipid-protein material pivotal for lung function, is hypothesized as a key factor that has not been routinely considered in the current in vitro models when determining the fate of inhaled nanomaterials. To explain its influence on cellular uptake and protective effects, nanoparticles are studied on two models of alveolar cells, in the absence or presence of pulmonary surfactant. Composition and interfacial performance of native human and porcine surfactants, a commercially available bovine surfactant (Alveofact), and an artificial lung lining fluid are characterized using shotgun lipidomics and biophysical approaches (i.e., Langmuir surface balances and captive bubble surfactometry). Plain and aminofunctionalized silica nanoparticles and a novel antimycobacterial nanoformulated benzothiazinone (BTZ043) are selected as examples of neutral, positively charged and therapeutically relevant nanoparticles, respectively. They are deposited onto monocultures of human alveolar epithelial and phagocytic cell lines in the presence or absence of the surfactant preparations, modeling the alveolar milieu. Only surfactant preparations with high interfacial activity and distinctive composition mitigated the toxicity of aerosolized particles, along with a tendency of aerosolized particles to aggregate. Key requirements of surfactant preparations needed when studying interactions of nanomaterials with the pulmonary air-blood barrier in vitro are identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.