ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2025
Estimating the incidence of actionable drug-gene interactions in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Observational
- Pharmacogenetics and the Response to Antidepressants in Major Depressive Disorder.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Pharmacogenetic variations and clinical implications of actionable CYP2D6/CYP2C19 variants in Central Indian patients with common mental disorders.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although several guidelines provide dosing recommendations for antidepressants based on patients' genetic information, pharmacogenetic testing for antidepressant use is rarely routinely performed in Japan. To clarify the clinical impact of pharmacogenetic testing, this study estimated the potential drug-gene interactions for first-time antidepressant treatment in Japanese patients with major depressive disorder. Methods: This study retrospectively included Japanese patients who were registered for depressive episodes (F32, International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision) and initiated on antidepressants between July 2022 and March 2023. Antidepressant prescription rates were calculated using a nationwide hospital-based database (Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd). The incidence of actionable drug-gene interactions was estimated by multiplying the first-time prescription rate of each relevant antidepressant by the frequency of its corresponding actionable phenotype. Results: A total of 3,197 patients were included in the analysis. Escitalopram was the most frequently prescribed antidepressant (18.7%, n = 597), followed by mirtazapine (17.5%, n = 561), and sertraline (15.4%, n = 493). Of the patients receiving their first treatment of major depressive disorder, 56.5% (n = 1,807) were prescribed a drug with actionable pharmacogenetic implications, and 26.4% (n = 844) were estimated to have required actionable therapeutic recommendations. The highest incidence of actionable drug-gene interactions was observed in escitalopram and CYP2C19 pairs (12.4%, n = 398). For sertraline and CYP2C19 or CYP2B6 pairs, the incidence was 11.0% (n = 352). Among all antidepressants, paroxetine had the highest incidence of actionable drug-gene interactions related to CYP2D6 at 1.8% (n = 56); this interaction was rarely observed with other antidepressants (<1%). Conclusions: We estimated that one in four Japanese patients with major depressive disorder who were prescribed first-time antidepressants had actionable drug-gene interactions. These results suggest that pre-emptive pharmacogenetic testing in the treatment of major depressive disorder could have important clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.