ArticlePEC innovation2025
Developing a digital video to support lung cancer screening in diverse populations.
Article in PEC innovation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health Communication and Stepped Reminders Interventions for Lung Cancer Screening: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2026Trial
- Mixed-Method Formative Evaluation and Cultural Adaptation of Digital Health Communication Content and Delivery Promoting Lung Cancer Screening Shared Decision-Making.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterTrial
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low dose computed tomography can reduce lung cancer mortality. However, awareness and knowledge of LCS are low. We developed and tested a video to support informed decision-making about LCS for use in diverse populations, including adults with low educational attainment. Methods: We conducted a prospective pre-post pilot study of adults eligible for LCS at three primary care clinics in the USA from 08/2022-07/2023. We developed a brief digital video, incorporating iterative modifications using participant feedback. We assessed knowledge of LCS before and after viewing the video and solicited open-ended feedback on video format and content. Results: The study included 29 adults (median [range] age, 62 [50-77] years; 52 % male). In interviews, participants commented on informational content, effect of the video on screening behaviors and intent, video style and appearance, and video features. After viewing the video, participant knowledge scores increased from baseline of 43 % correct to 59 %, Conclusions: A brief digital video about LCS, developed with feedback from end users, was motivating, clear, and effective in increasing knowledge across levels of educational attainment. Innovation: Using a patient-engaged, theoretically grounded development process, we developed a digital tool specifically to support lung cancer screening in diverse populations, including those with varied educational attainment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.