Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212803›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental research communications2024

Inclusive engagement for equitable resilience: community case study insights.

Emily Eisenhauer, Keely Maxwell, Brittany Kiessling, Siena Henson, Marissa Matsler, Raven Nee, Maureen Shacklette, Meridith Fry, Susan Julius

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental research communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Emily EisenhauerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-1754-4149
Keely MaxwellU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0802-4723
Brittany KiesslingU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3124-7375
Siena HensonOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Research Participant at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0005-1482-3045
Marissa MatslerU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Corvallis, OR, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3294-1991
Raven NeeOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education Research Participant at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.
Maureen ShackletteOak Ridge Associated Universities Participant at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0001-2422-4186
Meridith FryU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5392-2936
Susan JuliusU.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2361-8025

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Incorporating equity into climate resilience planning, especially through participatory processes, is important to adequately address social vulnerability and avoid reproducing inequities. Recent analyses of resilience and adaptation plans in the United States suggest that there is increasing attention on equity and justice, but a wide variation in how it is being incorporated and implemented. Available studies of resilience planning are limited by their focus on larger urban areas and on plan contents. This research contributes a qualitative analysis of participatory engagement for resilience planning in smaller cities and rural areas. It presents findings from community case studies used as part of human-centered design research to develop an equitable resilience planning tool. Materials from the tool were used to conduct participatory engagement activities including storytelling, mapping, and brainstorming actions that elicited community members' experiences with hazards and disasters and ideas for equitable resilience actions. Themes that emerged from the qualitative analysis of the workshop discussions were: community members' include both environmental and social concerns in addressing resilience, challenges associated with social vulnerability framing, the underlying social systems that perpetuate inequities, recognizing different types of trauma, the power of convening, and challenges with sustaining engagement without dedicated resources. This article provides insights that inform efforts to better incorporate equity into resilience planning and advance the study of equitable resilience.

Indexed as

climate changecommunity engagementequityresiliencesocial sciencevulnerability

Identifiers

PMID40212803
PMCPMC11980913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.