ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Recent Survival Gains in Stage IV NSCLC by Sociodemographic Strata.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Consolidative versus salvage stereotactic ablative radiotherapy to the primary lung tumor in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Prognostic Value of Routine Hematological Markers and ECOG Performance in Predicting Overall Survival in Lung Cancer-A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- An Uneven Playing Field: Survival Gains in Stage IV NSCLC Across Sociodemographic Strata.JTO clinical and research reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The management of stage IV NSCLC has been transformed by recent innovations. Nevertheless, access to medical innovations varies across sociodemographic groups in the United States, which may affect the rate of outcome improvements. Our objective was to evaluate the recent real-world gains in the survival of patients with stage IV NSCLC across sociodemographic groups. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried for treated patients diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2010 and 2020. Data was analyzed in three eras (2010-2013, 2014-2017, and 2018-2020). Two-year survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adjusted mortality risk was calculated using stratified Cox analysis. Results: A total of 393,586 patients with stage IV NSCLC received treatment. Chemotherapy administration decreased (from 64.8% to 25.1%), radiation therapy decreased (from 54.3% to 27.6%), and immunotherapy increased (from 2.0% to 51.8%). Between eras 1 and 3, median survival increased by 53.7% (6.7-10.3 mo); nevertheless, not all groups improved at the same pace. The median survival increased by 81% (from 8.3 to 15.0 mo) for Hispanic patients, by 54.7% (from 6.7 to 10.3 mo) for non-Hispanic Blacks, and by 46.7% (from 6.6 to 9.6 mo) for non-Hispanic Whites. The median survival of uninsured patients increased from 5.8 to 7.2 months (24.1%), whereas that of patients with private insurance increased from 8.6 to 14.7 months (70.9%). Conclusions: The survival of patients with treated stage IV NSCLC has improved considerably over the past decade. Nevertheless, expected survival and the pace of improvement differed across sociodemographic groups. Further studies to understand this outcome variability may enhance the effectiveness and equity of NSCLC treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.