Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212791›Full record

ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025

Non-invasive tests for fibrotic MASH for reducing screen failure in therapeutic trials.

Jeanne Fichez, Thomas Mouillot, Luisa Vonghia, Charlotte Costentin, Clémence Moreau, Marine Roux, Adèle Delamarre, Sven Francque, Ming-Hua Zheng, Jérôme Boursier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Liver Biopsy in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis Clinical Trials: Potential Pitfalls and Solutions.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeanne FichezHepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.
Thomas MouillotHepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France.
Luisa VonghiaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Charlotte CostentinGrenoble Alpes University/Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Clémence MoreauHIFIH Laboratory, SFR ICAT 4208, Angers University, Angers, France.
Marine RouxHIFIH Laboratory, SFR ICAT 4208, Angers University, Angers, France.
Adèle DelamarreHepatology Unit, Haut Leveque Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Sven FrancqueDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Ming-Hua ZhengMAFLD Research Center, Department of Hepatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jérôme BoursierHepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology Department, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & Aims: Therapeutic trials in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) are hampered by a high 70-80% screen failure rate mostly because of the absence of fibrotic MASH on baseline liver biopsies, underscoring the need for better selection of candidates. We compared the performance of eight non-invasive tests, designed or not for the diagnosis of fibrotic MASH. Methods: A total of 1,005 patients with histologically proven MASLD were included in five tertiary care centers. Three non-invasive tests developed for fibrotic MASH were evaluated: the simple blood test Fibrotic NASH Index (FNI), the specialized blood test MACK-3, and the elastography-based test FAST. Five non-invasive tests recommended for advanced fibrosis were evaluated as well: the simple blood test FIB-4, the specialized blood tests FibroTest and Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test (ELF™), and the elastography-based tests FibroScan and Agile3+. Fibrotic MASH was defined as MASH with MASLD activity score ≥4 and fibrosis score F ≥2. Results: Among simple blood tests (n = 1,005), FNI had a significantly higher area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) for fibrotic MASH than FIB-4 (0.709 [0.677-0.741] Conclusions: Sequential combinations using first-line tests designed for fibrotic MASH improves the identification of candidates for MASH therapeutic trials. Impact and implications: Drug development in metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is hampered by a high screen failure rate, one of the main reasons being the absence of MASH and significant fibrosis (fibrotic MASH) on the baseline liver biopsy, a key inclusion criterion in MASH therapeutic trials. Non-invasive tests represent an attractive opportunity to better select candidates for these trials, but most of them have been developed for advanced fibrosis and the new tests designed for the diagnosis of fibrotic MASH remain poorly validated. In this work, we demonstrate that the tests specifically designed for fibrotic MASH are more accurate for this diagnostic target than the tests currently recommended and initially developed for advanced fibrosis. We propose sequential combinations that will facilitate the identification of patients with fibrotic MASH in need of treatment, and their inclusion in MASH therapeutic trials.

Indexed as

Fibrotic MASHMASHMASLDNon-invasive tests

Identifiers

PMID40212791
PMCPMC11985113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.