ArticleJHEP reports : innovation in hepatology2025
CRISPR/Cas9 gene therapy increases the risk of tumorigenesis in the mouse model of hereditary tyrosinemia type I.
Article in JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Overview of Delivery Methods for Gene Editing.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Review
- Rapid multiplex liver gene-editing in mice using adeno-associated virus 8 or lipid nanoparticles.Molecular therapy. Advances · 2026Article
- Emerging CRISPR Approaches for Countering Immune Evasion: Insight from Recent Studies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Literature horizon scan for new scientific data on plants, microorganisms and animals, and their products obtained by new genomic techniques (October 2025).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Inborn Errors of Amino Acid Metabolism Revisited: Clinical Implications and Insights into Current Therapies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: The therapeutic potential of CRISPR gene editing has been demonstrated in various animal models; however, little is known about its long-term consequences. This study seeks to bridge this gap by investigating the lasting consequences of CRISPR gene therapy in an animal model of hereditary tyrosinemia type I (HT-I). We compared the standard of care-nitisinone, a small molecule inhibitor of hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPD)-with the deletion of the Methods: We assessed the efficacy and safety of CRISPR gene editing in fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase-deficient ( Results: CRISPR deletion and pharmacological inhibition of HPD both demonstrate efficient metabolic correction and rescue of lethality. Surprisingly, we detected a markedly increased incidence of hepatocellular cancer in the CRISPR gene therapy group (71%, 12/17 mice) compared with four control groups (nitisinone [19%, four of 21 mice], sgRNA only [6%, one of 16 mice], Cas9 only [11%, two of 19 mice], and hydrodynamic tail vein injection of both CRISPR constructs [24%, four of 17 mice]). All analyzed tumors in the CRISPR gene therapy group were deleted for Conclusions: CRISPR gene therapy increases the risk of hepatocellular cancer in the mouse model of HT-I. Because HT-I is characterized by inherent cancer susceptibility, this severe adverse event exposes the potential limitations of CRISPR gene therapy in cancer-prone disorders. Impact and implications: Not much is known about the long-term consequences of somatic gene editing. Our study investigates CRISPR gene therapy in tyrosinemia type I using viral vectors. Although the CRISPR-based therapy effectively treated the metabolic condition, it was associated with a higher incidence of liver cancer than the current standard of care. These findings highlight the potential risks of using CRISPR gene therapy in conditions predisposed to cancer development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.