ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2025
Comparison of 7 artificial intelligence models in predicting venous thromboembolism in COVID-19 patients.
Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in hematology: current trends and application areas.Annals of hematology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: An artificial intelligence (AI) approach can be used to predict venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objectives: To compare different AI models in predicting VTE using data from patients with COVID-19. Methods: We used feature ranking through recursive feature elimination with AI algorithms (logistic regression and random forest classifier) and standard statistical methods to identify the significant factors that contribute to developing VTE in COVID-19 patients using a large dataset from "Coagulopathy associated with COVID-19," a multicenter observational study. We developed 7 AI models (Multilayer perceptron classifier, Artificial neural network with backpropagation, eXtreme gradient boosting, Support vector classifier, Stochastic gradient descent classifier, Random forest classifier and Logistic regression classifier) using the selected significant features to predict the development of VTE during hospitalization and used K-fold cross-validation and hyperparameter tuning to validate and optimize the models. The models' predictive power was tested on 2649 (33% of 8027 overall patients), which were previously separated and not used during model training and validation stages. Results: Age, female sex, white ethnicity, comorbidities (diabetes, liver disease, autoimmune disease), and laboratory features (increased hemoglobin, white cell count, D-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, ferritin), and presence of multiorgan failure were major factors associated with the development of thrombosis. Support vector classifier (SVC) model outperformed all other models, achieving an accuracy of 97%. The SVC model also led in precision (0.98), recall (0.97), and F1 score (0.97), and recorded the lowest log-loss score (0.112 on the test dataset), reflecting better model convergence and an improved fit to the data. Additionally, it achieved the highest area under the curve score (0.983). Conclusion: The SVC model delivered the best overall performance outperforming similar studies that developed deep learning and machine-learning models for COVID-19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.