ArticleSmall science2024
Bioinspired Bone Seed 3D-Printed Scaffold via Trapping Black Phosphorus Nanosheet for Bone Regeneration.
Article in Small science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Photocontrolled biomimetic PEEK scaffold with black phosphorus-strontium ion cascade release for vascularized bone regeneration.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Black phosphorus in theragenerative medicine: a multi-organ perspective on disease modulation and tissue repair.Bioactive materials · 2026Review
- Advances in biomimetic mineralized biomaterials for bone tissue engineering.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Black Phosphorus Nanomaterials and the Senescent Osteoimmune Microenvironment: Mechanisms, Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Outlook.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Bionic Nanostructures Create Mechanical Signals to Mediate the Composite Structural Bone Regeneration Through Multi-System Regulation.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significance of endogenous mineralization in bone reconstruction is paramount, as it facilitates the accumulation of calcium ions for bone tissue deposition. However, conventional 3D-printed scaffolds lack the capacity for calcium ion enrichment and mineralization, coupled with their low bone inductive activity. Inspired from the development of natural plant seeds, a biomimetic 3D printing scaffold is developed by implanting photosensitive black phosphorus "bone seeds" (BS), guiding a sequential process mirroring rooting (osteoblast recruitment), sprouting (fibrous callus mineralization), flowering (osseous callus formation), and fruiting (callus plasticity). BS were trapped onto porous 3D polycaprolactone (PCL) scaffolds with aminated surfaces
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.