ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Evaluating the impact of an oral nutrition supplement on biochemical profile, growth, and body composition in Indian children: an
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- NRS2002-stratified body composition and laboratory characteristics in hospitalized cancer patients assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Objective: This study aims to assess the impact of an oral nutrition supplement (ONS) intervention on biochemical and growth parameters of Indian children using an Methods: An energetics-based modeling framework was developed to simulate the growth trajectories of children aged 6-16 years, integrating national datasets for Indian children. The model, validated with published literature, was designed to predict the effects of nutritional interventions. This study evaluated the impact of two Horlicks Oral Nutrition Supplement (ONS) formulations with varying micronutrient dosages on key growth outcomes. Various intervention scenarios were simulated, including comparisons of ONS with water vs. milk, and interventions with different nutrient compositions, such as macronutrients alone or a combination of macro- and micronutrients. The primary outcomes of the study focused on both biochemical and physical growth changes. Key serum nutrient levels were analyzed, alongside anthropometric measures such as height, weight, and body composition indicators, including fat-free mass, fat mass, and bone mineral content, over simulated periods of 4, 8, and 12 months. Results: The Conclusion: This study provides important insights into the potential benefits of Horlicks interventions for enhancing child growth outcomes. It underscores the effectiveness of computational models in the preliminary assessment of nutrition interventions, providing foundation for targeted clinical studies to improve child health and development. However, it is important to note that the model benchmarking was conducted using data from the Indian population, and the findings may not be directly applicable to other ethnicities without further validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.