Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212697›Full record

ArticleSmall science2024

State of the Art in Actuation of Micro/Nanorobots for Biomedical Applications.

Ahmed Elnaggar, Seungyeop Kang, Mingzhen Tian, Bing Han, Meysam Keshavarz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Small science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Enzymatic microbubble robots.Nature nanotechnology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Embodied Cross-Domain Intelligence in Biomedical Microrobots: A Review.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Therapeutic applications of nanobots and nanocarriers in cancer treatment.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ahmed ElnaggarMechanical Engineering Imperial College London Bessemer Building South Kensington Campus Exhibition Road Kensington London SW7 2AZ UK.
Seungyeop KangThe Hamlyn Centre for Robotic Surgery Imperial College London Bessemer Building South Kensington Campus Exhibition Road Kensington London SW7 2AZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4310-9941
Mingzhen TianInstitute of Medical Robotics School of Biomedical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dongchuan Road Shanghai 200240 China.
Bing HanInstitute of Medical Robotics School of Biomedical Engineering Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dongchuan Road Shanghai 200240 China.
Meysam KeshavarzImperial College London Electrical and Electronic Engineering Bessemer Building South Kensington Campus Exhibition Road Kensington London SW7 2AZ UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6813-4860

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of micro/nanorobotics stands poised to revolutionize various biomedical applications, given its potential to offer precision, reduced invasiveness, and enhanced functionality. In the face of such potential, understanding the mechanisms that drive these tiny robots, especially their actuation techniques, becomes critical. Although there is a surge in research dedicated to micro/nanorobotics, there exists a gap in consolidating the diverse actuation strategies and their suitability for biomedical applications. This comprehensive review seeks to bridge this gap by providing an in-depth evaluation of the current actuation techniques employed by micro/nanorobots, particularly emphasizing their relevance and potential for clinical translation. The discussion starts by elucidating the different actuation strategies, ranging from magnetic, electric, acoustic, light-based, to chemical and biological mechanisms. Then, various examples and meticulous assessment of each technique are offered, spotlighting their respective merits and limitations within a biomedical context. This review illuminates the transformative capabilities of these actuation methods in medicine. It not only highlights the progress made in this burgeoning field but also underscores the areas that require further exploration and development.

Indexed as

electrical actuationmagnetic actuationmicro/nanorobotsoptical actuationultrasonic actuation

Identifiers

PMID40212697
PMCPMC11935291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.