ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Changes in facial expressions can distinguish Parkinson's disease via Bayesian inference.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interaction- and asymmetry-aware facial blendshape analysis for objective quantification of Parkinsonian hypomimia.NPJ Parkinson's disease · 2026Article
- Construction and validation of an automated time label segmentation method for infant cries.BMC pediatrics · 2025Article
- Facial expression analysis and machine learning for objective assessment of alcohol craving in alcohol use disorder: a study protocol.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: We aimed to clarify the influence of facial expressions on providing early recognition and diagnosis of Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods: We included 18 people with PD and 18 controls. The participants were asked to perform 12 monosyllabic tests, 8 disyllabic tests, and 6 multisyllabic tests and the whole process were recorded. Then 26 video clips recorded were used to decipher the facial muscle movements and face expression via Noldus FaceReader 7.0 software. 16 suitable variables were selected to construct a Bayesian network model. Results: The area under the curve of the unsegmented-syllabic, monosyllabic, dissyllabic, and multisyllabic training models was 0.960, 0.958, and 0.962, respectively, with no significant difference between the models. Based on the Bayesian network models, we found that except for valence in the disyllabic model, all positive facial expressions in the four models are negatively associated with the probability of PD. Moreover, negative facial expressions, including sadness, anger, scared, and disgust in the unsegmented-syllabic, monosyllabic, and multisyllabic models, as well as anger in the disyllabic model, are positively correlated to the probability of PD. Sadness, scare and disgust in disyllabic model are negatively associated with the probability of PD. Conclusion: Except for sad, scared, and disgusted generated by reading disyllables, negative expressions generated by reading other syllables were positively associated with the probability of PD. In addition, scared expressions produced during monosyllabic reading had the greatest effect on the probability of PD, and disgusted expressions produced during multisyllabic reading had the least effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.