ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Limb Reconstruction System for Infected Nonunion: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Effectiveness of staged therapy using external fixation frame for infectious nonunion near knee joint].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Infected non-union of long bones is a complex orthopedic challenge, leading to prolonged disability and healthcare burden. The limb reconstruction system (LRS) offers advantages over the Ilizarov technique, including early weight-bearing, minimal invasiveness, and improved functional outcomes. This study evaluates the clinical and functional outcomes of infected nonunion treated with LRS. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary care center in eastern India from January 2019 to June 2023, including a pandemic-affected period. Thirty patients (18-68 years) with infected nonunion of the femur, tibia, and humerus were included. Data on demographics, infection characteristics, prior surgeries, and hematological parameters were recorded. All patients underwent surgical debridement followed by LRS application. Outcomes were assessed using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov scoring system. Results: Of 30 patients, 16 had femoral nonunion, 11 tibial, and 3 humeral. Union was achieved in 83.33% (25 cases), and infection eradication in 93.33% (28 cases). The mean time to union was 9.1 months. Complications included joint stiffness (26.67%), pin tract infection (23.33%), and limb length discrepancy (40%). No amputations were required, and re-fracture rates were low. Conclusion: LRS is a reliable and effective treatment for infected nonunion, enabling early mobilization and good functional outcomes. It provides a stable alternative to Ilizarov fixation with low complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.