ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Factors Affecting Clinical Outcomes in Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries in Adults: Review of Recent Literature.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Mortality following surgical management of traumatic sub-axial cervical spine injuries in a South African tertiary centre.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical spine injuries have a catastrophic effect on patients' general health and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We evaluate the role of different patient and injury-related factors in the overall outcomes of these injuries. Materials and Methods: Three databases, PubMed, SCOPUS, and EMBASE, were searched, and studies that matched the inclusion and exclusion criteria were reviewed. Out of 2313 total search results, 13 articles were read in detail, and finally, seven articles were included in this review. Results: Five out of these seven were retrospective studies. The factors assessed in these studies were age, sex, level of injury, intravenous steroid administration, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade, timing of surgery, blood pressure, and ventilator dependence. There was consensus in the studies on the role of a lower level of injury, lower ASIA grade, and surgical management being associated with better outcomes post-injury. There still needs to be further research through well-designed prospective trials to better ascertain the role of age, timing of surgery, and magnetic resonance imaging findings in their role in cervical spine injury prognosis. Conclusion: Low ASIA-grade injuries below C5 which are managed surgically favor neurological recovery. Further study is needed to conclusively determine the role of other factors and whether these factors can be modified to aid recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.