ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Cartilage Regeneration Potential of Platelet-Rich Plasma versus Plasma Rich in Growth Factors in Knee Osteoarthritis Based on Serum Biomarker of Cartilage Degradation, Coll2-1: A Triple-Blind Randomized Study.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Platelet-Rich Plasma research ecosystem: From mechanistic insights to precision treatment in knee osteoarthritis.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Through the course of the reported triple-blind randomized single-center study, we compared the clinical effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and evaluated their cartilage regeneration potential by studying the change in blood biomarkers related to cartilage breakdown, Coll2-1 before and after the intervention. Materials and Methods: During our study, the candidates with symptomatic KL grade 2 and 3 knee osteoarthritis were recruited and randomized into two groups. Each group received three intra-articular injections of PRP or PRGF, each one 4 weeks apart. Baseline visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were compared with scores reported before 2nd and 3rd injection and at the 6-month and 12-month follow-ups since the first intervention. Furthermore, baseline serum Coll2-1 levels were compared with those obtained at the 12-month follow-up since the first intervention. Results: The difference between the baseline means serum Coll2-1 values and the mean value obtained at the 12-month follow-up was found to be significant in both the PRP (P = 0.005) and PRGF (P = 0.009) groups showing significant reductions in the Coll2-1 levels at the 12-month follow-up of the patient. Conclusion: Both PRGF and PRP showed statistically significant reductions in serum Coll2-1 levels at 12 months. PRGF showed better VAS and WOMAC outcomes at the 12-month follow-up as compared to PRP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.