Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212509›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025

Osteomyelitis of the Odontoid Process: A Literature Review and Recommendations.

Justin Choi, Krishnamurthi Sundaram

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Justin ChoiDepartment of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, United States.
Krishnamurthi SundaramDepartment of Otolaryngology, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, New York, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Odontoid osteomyelitis (OOM) is a rare clinical entity that requires a high degree of suspicion for diagnosis. A literature review was conducted to make recommendations for early diagnosis and best practices in the management of OOM. Materials and Methods: Literature review of all available articles, all of which were case studies or case series, published in PubMed and Google Scholar. Results: There were 47 articles published from 1944 to 2024 with n = 54 with confirmed diagnosis of OOM. The median age was 52 years and 64% were male. Likely precipitating factors were identified in 29 patients (54%). Neck pain was the most common presentation (87%), followed by fever (57%) and neck stiffness (44%). Neurological symptoms developed in 50% of patients. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was frequently used (85%) with 72% of these indicating OOM. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen (82%). Surgery was performed in 59% of patients. Conclusion: To avoid delayed or misdiagnosis of this rare entity, a thorough history and physical should be performed to identify patient risk factors, salient complaints, and potential nidi of infection. MRI remains the gold standard in diagnosis. Early pathogen identification with appropriate antibiotics, and incision and drainage when possible, can treat OOM while avoiding surgery. However, surgery is indicated in cord compression secondary to atlantoaxial subluxation, a common and feared complication of OOM.

Indexed as

axisdensendonasal surgeryodontoid processOsteomyelitis

Identifiers

PMID40212509
PMCPMC11981528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.