ArticleProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium2024
Privacy-Preserving Fingerprinting Against Collusion and Correlation Threats in Genomic Data.
Article in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sharing genomic databases is critical to the collaborative research in computational biology. A shared database is more informative than specific genome-wide association studies (GWAS) statistics as it enables "do-it-yourself" calculations. Genomic databases involve intellectual efforts from the curator and sensitive information of participants, thus in the course of data sharing, the curator (database owner) should be able to prevent unauthorized redistributions and protect individuals' genomic data privacy. As it becomes increasingly common for a single database be shared with multiple recipients, the shared genomic database should also be robust against collusion attack, where multiple malicious recipients combine their individual copies to forge a pirated one with the hope that none of them can be traced back. The strong correlation among genomic entries also make the shared database vulnerable to attacks that leverage the public correlation models. In this paper, we assess the robustness of shared genomic database under both collusion and correlation threats. To this end, we first develop a novel genomic database fingerprinting scheme, called Gen-Scope. It achieves both copyright protection (by enabling traceability) and privacy preservation (via local differential privacy) for the shared genomic databases. To defend against collusion attacks, we augment Gen-Scope with a powerful traitor tracing technique, i.e., the Tardos codes. Via experiments using a real-world genomic database, we show that Gen-Scope achieves strong fingerprint robustness, e.g., the fingerprint cannot be compromised even if the attacker changes 45% of the entries in its received fingerprinted copy and colluders will be detected with high probability. Additionally, Gen-Scope outperforms the considered baseline methods. Under the same privacy and copyright guarantees, the accuracy of the fingerprinted genomic database obtained by Gen-Scope is around 10% higher than that achieved by the baseline, and in terms of preservations of GWAS statistics, the consistency of variant-phenotype associations can be about 20% higher. Notably, we also empirically show that Gen-Scope can identify at least one of the colluders even if malicious receipts collude after independent correlation attacks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.