Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212460›Full record

ArticleProceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium2024

Privacy-Preserving Fingerprinting Against Collusion and Correlation Threats in Genomic Data.

Tianxi Ji, Erman Ayday, Emre Yilmaz, Pan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Privacy Enhancing Technologies Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tianxi JiTexas Tech University.
Erman AydayCase Western Reserve University.
Emre YilmazUniversity of Houston-Downtown.
Pan LiCase Western Reserve University.

Funding

Accelerating Genomic Data Sharing and Collaborative Research with Privacy ProtectionR01LM014520 · NLM · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI Erman Ayday, Xiaoqian Jiang · 2023 to 2026
$2.6M
Privacy Challenges of Genomic Data-Sharing Beacons and SolutionsR01LM013429 · NLM · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI AYDAY, ERMAN · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013429NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sharing genomic databases is critical to the collaborative research in computational biology. A shared database is more informative than specific genome-wide association studies (GWAS) statistics as it enables "do-it-yourself" calculations. Genomic databases involve intellectual efforts from the curator and sensitive information of participants, thus in the course of data sharing, the curator (database owner) should be able to prevent unauthorized redistributions and protect individuals' genomic data privacy. As it becomes increasingly common for a single database be shared with multiple recipients, the shared genomic database should also be robust against collusion attack, where multiple malicious recipients combine their individual copies to forge a pirated one with the hope that none of them can be traced back. The strong correlation among genomic entries also make the shared database vulnerable to attacks that leverage the public correlation models. In this paper, we assess the robustness of shared genomic database under both collusion and correlation threats. To this end, we first develop a novel genomic database fingerprinting scheme, called Gen-Scope. It achieves both copyright protection (by enabling traceability) and privacy preservation (via local differential privacy) for the shared genomic databases. To defend against collusion attacks, we augment Gen-Scope with a powerful traitor tracing technique, i.e., the Tardos codes. Via experiments using a real-world genomic database, we show that Gen-Scope achieves strong fingerprint robustness, e.g., the fingerprint cannot be compromised even if the attacker changes 45% of the entries in its received fingerprinted copy and colluders will be detected with high probability. Additionally, Gen-Scope outperforms the considered baseline methods. Under the same privacy and copyright guarantees, the accuracy of the fingerprinted genomic database obtained by Gen-Scope is around 10% higher than that achieved by the baseline, and in terms of preservations of GWAS statistics, the consistency of variant-phenotype associations can be about 20% higher. Notably, we also empirically show that Gen-Scope can identify at least one of the colluders even if malicious receipts collude after independent correlation attacks.

Indexed as

collusioncorrelation attackgenomic dataprivacy

Identifiers

PMID40212460
PMCPMC11983700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.