ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2025
Xanomeline and Trospium Chloride Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Schizophrenia: A Post Hoc Analysis of Number Needed to Treat, Number Needed to Harm, and Likelihood to Be Helped or Harmed.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of KarXT in Hospitalized Adults With DSM-5 Schizophrenia
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KarXT in Acutely Psychotic Hospitalized Adults With DSM-5 Schizophrenia
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KarXT in Acutely Psychotic Hospitalized Adults With DSM-5 Schizophrenia
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The prospective incidence of treatment-resistant schizophrenia: analysis of the CATIE trial using the TRRIP consensus.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Challenges and opportunities for ginseng-based medicines in treating cardiac fibrosis from mechanistic insights to clinical translation.Chinese herbal medicines · 2026Review
- Beyond dopamine: KarXT and emerging mechanism-based therapies in schizophrenia.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- The Clinically Meaningful Score Difference and Meaningful Score Regions in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Total Score from Post Hoc Analyses of a Phase 3 Pivotal Clinical Trial of Transdermal Asenapine in Patients with Schizophrenia.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Article
- Xanomeline-Trospium for the Treatment of Schizophrenia.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025Review
- Considerations for Augmenting Aripiprazole Long-Acting Injectables with Other Antipsychotics: A Mini-Review.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Choosing among the long-acting injectable antipsychotics: an evidence-based pragmatic guide.CNS spectrums · 2025Review
- Real-world effectiveness and safety of xanomeline and trospium for treatment-resistant schizophrenia in a state hospital system.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Describe xanomeline and trospium chloride efficacy and safety/tolerability for the treatment of schizophrenia using number needed to treat (NNT), number needed to harm (NNH), and likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH). Methods: Categorical data were extracted from the three 5-week, randomized, double blind, placebo controlled EMERGENT-1, EMERGENT-2, and EMERGENT-3 clinical trials of xanomeline/trospium in adults with schizophrenia experiencing acute psychosis. Efficacy was assessed using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S), and categorical response criteria. Safety and tolerability were assessed using rates of discontinuation and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). NNT, NNH, and LHH values were calculated for each individual study as well as pooled. Results: In data from the acute EMERGENT trials, NNT estimates were significant for xanomeline/trospium vs placebo for the pre-specified treatment response threshold of ≥30% reduction from baseline in PANSS total score at Week 5 (NNT=5 [95% CI, 4-8]). NNT estimates for response thresholds of ≥20% and ≥40% reduction from baseline in PANSS total score and ≥1- and ≥2-point decrease from baseline in CGI-S score were <10, indicating a clinically relevant therapeutic benefit of xanomeline/trospium over placebo. Estimates of NNH vs placebo for the most common TEAEs were >10, with the exception of nausea and vomiting; however, rates of discontinuations due to TEAEs of nausea, dyspepsia, or vomiting were low (NNH=49 [95% CI, 28-182]). LHH indicated an overall benefit of xanomeline/trospium vs placebo for all assessed outcomes. In indirect comparisons based on published data from trials of available antipsychotics approved for schizophrenia, xanomeline/trospium exhibited comparable or more robust NNT estimates vs placebo and was the least likely agent to be associated with weight gain or somnolence/sedation. Conclusion: In the 5-week EMERGENT clinical trials, NNT, NNH, and LHH assessments demonstrated a favorable benefit-risk profile for xanomeline/trospium. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT03697252, NCT04659161, NCT04738123.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.