ArticleSmall science2022
Lessons from Nature for Carbon-Based Nanoarchitected Metamaterials.
Article in Small science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical properties of 3D graphene metamaterials with primitive three-period minimal surface.Journal of molecular modeling · 2026Article
- Unravelling Size-Dependent and Coupled Properties in Mechanical Metamaterials: A Couple-Stress Theory Perspective.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Article
- Dragonfly-Inspired Wing Design Enabled by Machine Learning and Maxwell's Reciprocal Diagrams.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bioinspired materials often achieve superior mechanical properties owing to their microscale architectures that resemble design motifs in biological materials. The bioinspired architectures can be extended to nanoscale, where carbon-based materials, including graphene and carbon nanotubes, are excellent candidates as building blocks. This study introduces carbon-based nanoarchitected metamaterials inspired by seven biological design motifs, i.e., cellular, gradient, tubular, fibrous, helicoidal, suture, and layered structures. Numerical studies based on molecular dynamics simulation along with continuum-based finite element analysis are conducted for each bioinspired design to examine the unique mechanical properties, namely specific stiffness, specific strength, failure strain, and specific energy absorption, under tensile/shear loading conditions. Different deformation and failure mechanisms found by molecular simulation and continuum mechanics are discussed. The numerical results show that the mechanical properties of the introduced bioinspired and carbon-based nanoscale designs may surpass the performance of the conventional carbon-based counterparts. The developed nanoarchitected metamaterials demonstrate instances of possibilities for filling the empty regions in the Ashby charts to attain lightweight advanced materials that can also break the trade-off between strength and failure strain. These findings impart lessons from the constitutive structure of biological materials to form the next generation of multifunctional architected metamaterials with rationally designed nano-architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.