ReviewEuropean heart journal open2025
Post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation and sex differences in clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in European heart journal open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gender differences in the right atrial appendage and right atrium-related structures in patients with atrial fibrillation and their association with ablation outcomes.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There is conflicting literature on sex differences and clinical outcomes in patients who develop atrial fibrillation (AF) post-cardiac surgery. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes between females and males with post-cardiac surgery AF. A systematic search was conducted for studies published until 27 September 2024 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Included studies compared mortality and stroke in females vs. males who developed AF after cardiac surgery. Outcomes of interest were mortality and stroke. Pooled prevalence was used to compare comorbidities. Raw event rates were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), which were pooled with a fixed-effects model. 10 422 studies were identified and 5 studies met inclusion criteria. 14 970 patients who developed AF after cardiac surgery were included, of whom 3748 were females. The length of follow-up was up to 10 years. The weighted average age was 70.4 ± 2.9 years in females and 66.7 ± 2.4 years in males (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.