Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212393›Full record

ReviewCurrent trauma reports2025

Motor Vehicle Safety - Has Technology and Legislation Made a Difference?

Matthew Kazaleh, Camille Meschia, Marie Crandall

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current trauma reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Matthew KazalehDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI U.S.A.
Camille MeschiaDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL U.S.A.
Marie CrandallDepartment of Surgery, University of Florida Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL U.S.A.

Funding

Surgeon Scientist Training in Cardiac DiseasesT32HL166113 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Gorav Ailawadi, YUQING Eugene CHEN · 2023 to 2026
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL166113
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death among those less than 54 years old in the United States. From the genesis of automobile transportation, significant efforts to improve crash safety technology standards and traffic laws have been made. Despite these attempts, in 2021, the motor vehicle fatality rate increased by 10.5%, leading some to question the effectiveness of recent efforts. This critical review aims to discuss the history of motor vehicle technologic and legislative advancements, data investigating effectiveness, and opportunity for future improvement. Recent Findings: Collective transition to primary seatbelt laws, advancement of airbag design, implementation of driver assist technologies, as well as stricter alcohol legislation may offer response to the recent increase in motor vehicle fatalities. Summary: A coordinated effort for change from automobile manufacturers, drivers, law enforcement, and local/federal governments will be required to address the recent increase in motor vehicle fatalities.

Indexed as

LegislationMotor vehicleMVCSafetyTechnology

Identifiers

PMID40212393
PMCPMC11978691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.