SynthesisPeerJ2025
Prognostic value of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio in gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Progression after endoscopic treatment for type I gastric neuroendocrine tumors: A single-center retrospective study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) might be connected with an unfavorable tumor prognosis. We sought to conduct a meta-analysis of published studies exploring the prognostic value of NLR in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasm (GEP-NEN). Methods: We have referred to the PRISMA 2020 for the Abstracts checklist and have registered our review at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (registration number CRD42020187679). The PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were screened using words like 'neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio', 'neuroendocrine tumors', and others up to July 2024. In our study, we evaluated the significance of NLR on overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with GEP-NEN. Subgroup analysis were conducted to identify the origins of heterogeneity and examine the impact of factor grouping. Results: We gathered 18 cohorts with 2,995 cases. All included studies were high quality, with Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) scores ranging from 6 to 8. The pooled analysis revealed that a higher NLR related to worse OS (hazard ratio (HR): 4.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) [3.35-6.29], Conclusion: This meta-analysis showed that a high NLR predicted poor OS, RFS, and PFS in patients with GEP-NEN and can be used as a promising predictor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.