ArticleSmall science2023
A Review of Top-Down Strategies for the Production of Quantum-Sized Materials.
Article in Small science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison Between Ultrasonic and Thermal Exfoliation for Molybdenum Disulfide Nanoparticles-A Multifunctional Study.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- EnterohemorrhagicACS omega · 2026Article
- Precursor-dependent optical and structural properties of eleven NIR-emissive graphene quantum dots for bioimaging applications.2d materials · 2026Article
- Multiscale electric fields direct charges to single-atom cobalt sites for photocatalytic HNature communications · 2026Article
- Mango peels-assisted synthesis of carbon quantum dots for potential optical sensing of diazinon.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Carbon quantum dots (CQDs) in forensic investigations: a review of current applications and future perspectives.RSC advances · 2025Review
- Nucleation-Controlled Doping of II-VI Semiconductor Nanocrystals Mediated by Magic-Sized Clusters.Small science · 2025Article
- Device Applications Enabled by Bandgap Engineering Through Quantum Dot Tuning: A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanoscience and technology have made significant achievements in the past few decades. Quantum-sized materials, as a key component of nanomaterials, have attracted increasing interest due to their unique structures and extremely reduced sizes. Such fascinating materials have been widely applied in various fields because of their strong quantum confinement and remarkable surface/edge effects. Production methods have an important impact on the properties of quantum-sized materials. Considering that many previous reviews have reported the synthesis of quantum-sized materials by bottom-up methods, this review will focus on the top-down methods. The advantages and disadvantages of each strategy are analyzed. At the end, the perspectives and challenges toward the future development of quantum-sized materials are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.