Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212275›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2025

Research progress of artificial intelligence and machine learning in pulmonary embolism.

Yue Li, Limin Zhang, Haoran Liu, Yanxia Li, Zhuo Liu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yue LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Limin ZhangDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Haoran LiuDalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Yanxia LiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Zhuo LiuDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathophysiology and clinical manifestations of pulmonary embolism are complex, heterogeneous, and the disease burden is severe, and its prediction and diagnosis are of major challenges. Artificial intelligence (AI) is a field of computer science that involves the development of programs and complex data analysis designed to replicate human cognitive processes. In recent years, with the continuous development of medical information technology, the application of AI in the diagnosis and treatment of diseases has made rapid progress, especially in the field of pulmonary embolism, which is mainly based on imaging. In this review, we summarize the current application prospects and directions of AI in early prediction, screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of PE, and discuss the main challenges and future of AI in pulmonary embolism (PE), in order to provide a theoretical basis for the application of AI in the risk assessment and standardized management of PE.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencediagnosismachine learningpredictionprognosispulmonary embolism

Identifiers

PMID40212275
PMCPMC11983447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.