ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Recurrent choledocholithiasis with cholangitis 30 years post-cholecystectomy with negative ERCP: a case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Recurrent primary choledocholithiasis refers to the recurrent presence of biliary stones in the bile duct. Recurrent Choledocholithiasis is not a rare occurrence within 3 years of Cholecystectomy (CCY), with an incidence of 27.9% in one study. However, it is uncommon after 30 years of CCY. Case presentation: A 64-year-old female patient with a history of CCY and recurrent choledocholithiasis and cholangitis with liver abscess presented with signs and symptoms of cholangitis despite a negative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) one week before presentation. Blood cultures were positive for gram-negative rods,` consistent with her cholangitis. Clinical discussion: This case poses a question on the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in high-risk patients for choledocholithiasis. Current guidelines recommend proceeding with ERCP directly in high-risk patients and obtaining EUS or MRCP in intermediate-risk patients. However, EUS or MRCP can be a helpful tool in scouting before proceeding with ERCP in complicated cases such as our case. Moreover, identification of patient-specific risk factors for such a rare entity would help with a better understanding of management and prevention of recurrent choledocholithiasis. Our patient had multiple other risk factors, including a dilated common bile duct and a history of multiple episodes of choledocholithiasis. Although not currently approved, certain oral medications can help reduce the risk of recurrence of primary choledocholithiasis. Conclusion: Early detection and localization of stones with EUS or MRCP is recommended in complicated cases of recurrent choledocholithiasis to prevent additional invasive procedures which in turn increase the risk of recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.