ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
The evolution of intracranial aneurysm clipping: a historical perspective.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advances in Microsurgical Clipping for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Narrative Review of Intraoperative Technologies and Clinical Outcomes.Asian journal of neurosurgery · 2026Review
- Integrating Laplace's law with patient-specific hemodynamics to predict rupture risk in unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review of a biophysical and computational framework.Surgery in practice and science · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms are serious vascular conditions that pose a significant risk of life-threatening subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) if ruptured. Over the past century, the surgical management of aneurysms has undergone remarkable advancements, with aneurysm clipping emerging as a cornerstone treatment. This review traces the historical evolution of aneurysm clipping, from the formidable challenges of early 20th-century brain surgery to the sophisticated techniques used today. Key milestones include Victor Horsley's pioneering ligation methods, Harvey Cushing's foundational neurosurgical principles, and Walter Dandy's groundbreaking intracranial aneurysm clipping in 1937. Technological innovations have played a crucial role in advancing the field. The introduction of the operating microscope by M.G. Yasargil in the 1960s and Charles Drake's fenestrated clip design in 1969 significantly improved surgical precision and outcomes. The emergence of endovascular techniques, particularly Guglielmi's detachable coils (GDC) in the 1990s, provided a minimally invasive alternative to clipping. Today, both approaches remain valuable, with treatment selection based on aneurysm characteristics and patient-specific factors. Modern aneurysm clipping has further benefited from cutting-edge imaging technologies, intraoperative monitoring systems, and refined clip designs, enhancing both safety and efficacy. Landmark comparative studies, such as ISAT and BRAT, have provided critical evidence guiding treatment strategies and optimizing patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.