Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212180›Full record

ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025

Surgery of craniosynostosis: a historical review.

Javed Iqbal, Kivanc Yangi, Ansa Naseem, Carlos E Calderon Valero, Bipin Chaurasia

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Javed IqbalDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Kivanc YangiDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Health Sciences, Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascioglu City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Ansa NaseemKing Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Carlos E Calderon ValeroMedical Student, University of Puerto Rico, School of Medicine, San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA.
Bipin ChaurasiaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery Clinic, Birgunj, Nepal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Calvarial sutures and skull-shape deformities have been recognized since ancient times, but their direct link to premature suture fusion was first established in the 19th century. The earliest surgical attempts for craniosynostosis emerged in 1890 with strip craniectomy, though early outcomes were largely unsuccessful. Surgical progress stagnated for decades due to complications and skepticism surrounding these techniques. The 20th century brought significant advancements, beginning with successful strip craniectomies in the 1920s and later attempts to prevent re-ossification through material barriers. The late 1960s marked a pivotal shift with the introduction of cranial vault remodeling, followed by the integration of external cranial vault devices and helmet therapy in the 1980s. By the 1990s, endoscopic strip craniectomy revolutionized treatment by minimizing invasiveness and blood loss. Despite these innovations, debates persist regarding optimal surgical timing, long-term outcomes, and patient adherence to treatment. Emerging technologies such as 3D imaging, artificial intelligence, and personalized medicine hold promise for the future of craniosynostosis management.

Indexed as

birth defectscraniosynostosismetopic synostosissagittal synostosis

Identifiers

PMID40212180
PMCPMC11981402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.