ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
The role of advocacy and policy in advancing global neurosurgery.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A scoping review on the essential role of global neurotrauma in achieving the sustainable development goals.Discover public health · 2026Review
- Governance and policy in global neurosurgery: a scoping review of national and international efforts.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global neurosurgery has witnessed transformative developments in advocacy and policy aimed at overcoming the barriers that hinder equitable access to neurosurgical care. This paper reveals the stark disparities faced by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with an annual burden of 5 million affected individuals. Despite these challenges, the emergence of global neurosurgery stands as a beacon of hope, aspiring to deliver timely, safe, and affordable neurosurgical care. Advocacy and policy play pivotal roles in this endeavour, exemplified by initiatives, like National Surgical, Obstetrics, and Anesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) and Global Neurosurgery Initiatives (GNI), addressing accessibility, training, and disparities. Collaborations between diverse entities and interdisciplinary approaches gain prominence, fostering comprehensive advocacy and policy frameworks. A resolute commitment to equity is discernible, propelling policies toward universal access to neurosurgical care. However, crucial challenges, such as limited resources, awareness gaps, complex political landscapes, data deficiencies, and insufficient international collaborations, must be addressed to see the full potential of these initiatives. While challenges persist, progress is evident through collaborative efforts, technological advancements, and evolving policy landscapes, promising a trajectory toward accessible, safe, and affordable neurosurgical care for all.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.