ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in movement disorders management: exploring therapeutic efficacy, neurobiological mechanisms, and clinical implications.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Adaptive neuromodulation dialogues: navigating current challenges and emerging innovations in neuromodulation system development.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic approach, offering targeted neuromodulation for movement disorders refractory to medical management or stereotactic surgery. However, assessing its benefits against potential risks is essential. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DBS in movement disorders, shedding light on its role as an alternative therapeutic option. Methods: A comprehensive search of databases after systemic review yielded studies published in English from 2000 to the present. Data selection, screening, extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed meticulously. Statistical analysis was conducted using RevMan 2.0, with significant heterogeneity addressed through appropriate methods. Results: Our meta-analysis included 40 studies assessing the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III, revealing a significant improvement in motor symptoms (mean difference [MD]: -18.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] [-20.17, -15.93], Conclusion: DBS demonstrates efficacy in improving motor symptoms, disease severity, tremor, gait, and tic severity in movement disorders. However, further research is needed to elucidate long-term efficacy and safety outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.