ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Reexpansion unilateral pulmonary edema after drainage of pneumothorax: case report.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Re-expansion pulmonary edema (REPE) is a rare but potentially fatal complication that occurs after rapid re-expansion of a collapsed lung, particularly following pleural drainage. The exact pathophysiology remains poorly understood, but several interrelated mechanisms are involved, such as fluid overload and alteration of the alveolar-capillary barrier. The mortality rate varies between 5% and 20% according to the literature. Early recognition and effective treatment of this complication is essential to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: A 22-year-old patient suffered a fall from the third floor. Imaging revealed several fractures, a subgaleal hematoma and a right pneumothorax. After surgery to stabilize the fractures, a worsening of the pneumothorax necessitated pleural drainage without aspiration. One hour after drainage, the patient developed respiratory distress and an X-ray showed unilateral pulmonary edema. Treatment with continuous positive airway pressure was initiated, resulting in rapid improvement and disappearance of radiological signs. The chest tube was removed and the patient was transferred to the trauma unit. Clinical discussion: REPE usually occurs after rapid re-expansion of the lung. The main risk factors include young age, prolonged lung collapse and excessive drainage. Treatment is preventive (slow drainage, without aspiration) and symptomatic (oxygen therapy, assisted ventilation if necessary). Conclusion: REPE is a little-known but potentially fatal complication of thoracic drainage. It is essential to understand the risk factors and adopt appropriate preventive measures. Early identification and prompt management are crucial to avoid a severe course. Despite advances in our understanding of EPR, further research is needed to better elucidate its mechanisms and optimize its management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.