ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Public health meets global surgery: a synergistic approach to better outcomes.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cataract-LMM Large-Scale Multi-Source Multi-Task Benchmark for Deep Learning in Surgical Video Analysis.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Global Surgery and Health Equity: Integrating Education, Research, and Policy-A Perspective Review.Health science reports · 2026Article
- A qualitative evaluation of a global surgery course within the University of Cape Town's master of public health curriculum: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Global surgery (GS) aims to improve access to timely, quality, and affordable surgical care worldwide, yet it remains underrepresented in public health education. Objective: This cross-sectional study assessed the awareness and knowledge of GS among 242 public health professionals. Methods and results: Data collected via a self-structured questionnaire using SPSS 25 revealed significant gender and age diversity, with the majority being young professionals (76.4% aged 20-29). Most participants (71.5%) held a master's degree, and 55% had 1-5 years of public health experience. While 60% were familiar with the term "Global Surgery," a considerable portion lacked a comprehensive understanding. Participants emphasized the need to integrate GS into public health curricula through faculty development, practical training, scholarships, and research collaborations. Conclusion: These strategies aim to bridge the knowledge gap and enhance the role of surgical care in global health. Despite being essential for addressing a significant portion of the global disease burden, surgical care remains inaccessible to many in LMICs due to systemic barriers. This study underscores the importance of fostering international partnerships and promoting a multidisciplinary approach to improve surgical care access, ultimately contributing to better health outcomes globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.