ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2025
Unveiling documentation deficiencies: a clinical audit of histopathology request forms at a tertiary care hospital.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inflammatory Dermatoses: An Audit of Histopathology Reporting Quality and the Role of Clinicopathological Conference.Cureus · 2026Article
- Assessment of histopathology and cytology request form documentation quality using six Sigma and Pareto analysis in Benghazi, Libya.Diagnostic pathology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Accurate histopathology request forms are essential for effective diagnosis and treatment. This audit assessed the completeness of these forms at Fauji Foundation Hospital, aiming to identify and address documentation gaps. Methods: A retrospective review of 300 histopathology request forms from January to June 2024 was conducted. Forms were evaluated for completeness in patient details, hospital admission, biopsy information, and clinical notes. SPSS software was used for data analysis, and an educational intervention was implemented based on initial findings. Results: The audit revealed high compliance for patient profile details but low reporting of patient contact information (39.7%). While hospital admission and biopsy details were well-documented, clinical notes were incomplete in 27.3% of cases. Post-intervention improvements included better documentation of patient contact details and biopsy nature. Conclusion: The audit highlights the need for thorough and accurate histopathology request forms. Improved documentation practices, supported by ongoing education, are crucial for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.