ReviewJPRAS open2025
Advancements in biomarker techniques for precision and safety in facial nerve identification during head and neck surgeries: a comprehensive review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This review aimed to evaluate biomarkers' efficacy in enhancing facial nerve identification during head and neck surgical procedures. It summarized the literature on biomarker techniques for intraoperative visualization of the facial nerve, focusing on applications, findings, and clinical implications. Introduction: Precision is paramount in head and neck surgeries due to complex anatomical structures. In particular, facial procedures demand meticulous planning to preserve facial nerve function. Iatrogenic injuries underscore the need for advancements in nerve identification techniques. This review provided insights into biomarkers' potential role in enhancing facial nerve identification. Methods: A PubMed search using specific keywords yielded 45 articles, with 40 meeting the initial inclusion criteria. Selection was based on relevance to facial surgery and publication in English. After screening and conflict resolution, 12 articles underwent full-text review. Results: Various biomarkers, such as fluorescent probes and retrograde tracers, have shown efficacy in improving facial nerve identification across different surgical scenarios. These techniques enhance precision in identifying nerve branches and aid in tumor resections. Conclusion: Enhanced facial nerve identification prevents nerve injuries during surgery. Although fluorescent dye-based approaches show promise, further research is needed to establish safety and long-term efficacy. Adoption of these techniques could improve patient outcomes and reduce complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.