ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
A Refinement Technique to Conceal the Scar Along the Labia Majora in Gender-affirming Vaginoplasty.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Labia Minora Redefined: A Nonpenile Inversion Technique in Gender-affirming Vaginoplasty.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the traditional gender-affirming vaginoplasty technique has been successful in closely resembling natural female anatomy, the surgical scar on the labia majora has been a significant concern for many. To address this issue, the author has developed a technique to conceal the scar resulting from the trimming of excess scrotal skin within the robustly reconstructed interlabial sulcus, thereby reducing its visibility and improving vulvar aesthetic outcomes. Of the 107 patients who underwent gender-affirming vaginoplasty, 72 underwent the traditional technique, whereas 35 underwent the technique in which scars from scrotal skin excision were concealed within the interlabial sulcus. The outcomes from the latter group showed that surgical scars were completely concealed in 32 (91.4%) patients, whereas 2 (5.7%) patients experienced scar migration lateral to the interlabial sulcus, and 1 (2.9%) patient had a loss of interlabial sulcus definition. By comparison, all patients who underwent the traditional technique exhibited visible scars in the center of the labia majora. This technique, which conceals the scar within the interlabial sulcus, demonstrates superior vulvar aesthetic outcomes compared with the traditional method.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.