ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Comparison of Conjoint Fascial Sheath Suspension and Levator Muscle-conjoint Fascial Sheath Complex Suspension in Blepharoptosis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The conjoint fascial sheath (CFS) has been widely utilized for blepharoptosis correction recently. However, the different effects of various surgical techniques and the intraoperative palpebral fissure height (PFH) under general anesthesia are unclear. Therefore, we compared and observed the effects of CFS suspension and levator muscle (LM)-CFS complex suspension under general anesthesia. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on children with congenital moderate-to-severe blepharoptosis who underwent CFS suspension (group A) from January to December 2019 and LM-CFS complex suspension (group B) from January to December 2021. The main indices included the PFH, margin reflex distance 1 (MRD-1) value preoperatively and immediately, 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 6 months after surgery. Results: Thirty-six patients in group A and 51 patients in group B were included in the final statistical analysis. There was no significant difference in the preoperative mean PFH and MRD-1 values between the 2 groups ( Conclusions: Compared with CFS suspension, LM-CFS complex suspension for the treatment of moderate-to-severe blepharoptosis in children under general anesthesia had better results, with relatively more stable PFH.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.