ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Sonographic Analysis of CureJet Injection Depth Consistency After Abdominal Stretch Mark Treatment Using Hyperdiluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Effective Delivery of Poly(D,L-lactic Acid) (Juvelook) via Needle-Free Injection (CUREJET) for Facial Rejuvenation.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of needle-free jet injection of self-crosslinking hyaluronic acid for facial fine wrinkles and skin texture: 12-week clinical outcomes in Asian women.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Erratum: Sonographic Analysis of CureJet Injection Depth Consistency After Abdominal Stretch Mark Treatment Using Hyperdiluted Calcium Hydroxylapatite: Erratum.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the effectiveness and consistency of needle-free jet injectors in administering injections at uniform depths, particularly for the treatment of stretch marks. Ensuring consistent injection depth is crucial for achieving optimal therapeutic outcomes, especially when dealing with challenging skin conditions like stretch marks. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted involving 25 patients treated for abdominal stretch marks using a needle-free injector (CureJet). For each patient, 10 injection sites were assessed via ultrasound, and the depth of the injections was measured. The mean injection depths and standard deviations were calculated for each patient to assess the consistency of injections. The injected substance was diluted calcium hydroxylapatite, a well-known biostimulatory agent used for skin rejuvenation. Injections were repeated over multiple sessions with consistent parameters to evaluate the reproducibility of the technique. Results: The mean injection depth across patients was 0.5126 cm, with considerable variability observed between patients. The standard deviation ranged from 0.0326 to 0.2132 cm, indicating significant differences in the consistency of injection depths. The statistical analysis demonstrated that the needle-free injector achieved variable depths, with some injections penetrating deeper than intended, whereas others remained superficial. Conclusions: While needle-free injectors like CureJet provide a promising alternative to conventional needles, achieving consistent injection depths remains a challenge. This study highlights the need for further refinement in injector technology and technique to improve uniformity in treatment depth, particularly for applications like scar treatment and stretch mark reduction. Enhancing precision in such devices could lead to better patient outcomes and increased safety in aesthetic treatments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.