ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Interventions to Support People With HIV Following Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-Effectiveness of Linkage Case Management for Hospitalized People With HIV.JAMA network open · 2025Trial
- Differences in utilization, complications, and mortality after cancer surgery by HIV status among Medicaid beneficiaries from 2001-2021.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Ensuring effective transitions in care for hospitalized people living with HIV.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Individuals hospitalized with HIV-related complications face high post-discharge mortality and morbidity, particularly in resource-limited settings. This systematic review evaluated the impact of interventions to reduce post-hospital mortality, lower readmissions, and improve linkage to care. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 1 October 2024 for studies reporting outcomes of post-discharge interventions. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data using random effects meta-analysis. Results: We included 4 randomized controlled trials (conducted in Spain, South Africa, Tanzania, and the United States) and 6 observational studies (Canada, Thailand, Zambia, and the United States). Interventions included pre-discharge counseling, medication review, referral to care, and goal setting, as well as post-discharge follow-up via home visits, telephone calls, and support from social workers or community health workers. Pooled data from randomized controlled trials showed no difference between post-discharge interventions and usual care in mortality, but the estimate was imprecise (relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% CI, .59-1.63). However, interventions may reduce readmissions (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, .52-1.30) and may slightly improve linkage/retention in care (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, .95-1.27). Observational studies reported similar results, with no mortality effect but potential reductions in readmissions (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, .48-1.25) and improved linkage/retention (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.81). Interventions were largely feasible, acceptable, and low cost. Conclusions: Interventions that include pre-discharge care planning and post-discharge follow-up, such as telephone contact and home visits, may improve linkage to care and reduce readmissions. However, interventions were not associated with reduced post-discharge mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.