Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40212034›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Interventions to Support People With HIV Following Hospital Discharge: A Systematic Review.

Nathan Ford, Ajay Rangaraj, Joseph N Jarvis, David S Lawrence, Roger Chou, Alena Kamenshchikova, Sally Hargreaves, Rachael M Burke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan FordDepartment of HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8238-4228
Ajay RangarajDepartment of HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Joseph N JarvisDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
David S LawrenceDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5439-4039
Roger ChouPacific Northwest Evidence-Based Practice Center, Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Alena KamenshchikovaDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7745-9819
Sally HargreavesInstitute for Infection and Immunity, City St George's University of London, London, UK.
Rachael M BurkeDepartment of Clinical Research, Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Individuals hospitalized with HIV-related complications face high post-discharge mortality and morbidity, particularly in resource-limited settings. This systematic review evaluated the impact of interventions to reduce post-hospital mortality, lower readmissions, and improve linkage to care. Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to 1 October 2024 for studies reporting outcomes of post-discharge interventions. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We pooled data using random effects meta-analysis. Results: We included 4 randomized controlled trials (conducted in Spain, South Africa, Tanzania, and the United States) and 6 observational studies (Canada, Thailand, Zambia, and the United States). Interventions included pre-discharge counseling, medication review, referral to care, and goal setting, as well as post-discharge follow-up via home visits, telephone calls, and support from social workers or community health workers. Pooled data from randomized controlled trials showed no difference between post-discharge interventions and usual care in mortality, but the estimate was imprecise (relative risk [RR], 0.98; 95% CI, .59-1.63). However, interventions may reduce readmissions (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, .52-1.30) and may slightly improve linkage/retention in care (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, .95-1.27). Observational studies reported similar results, with no mortality effect but potential reductions in readmissions (RR, 0.77; 95% CI, .48-1.25) and improved linkage/retention (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11-1.81). Interventions were largely feasible, acceptable, and low cost. Conclusions: Interventions that include pre-discharge care planning and post-discharge follow-up, such as telephone contact and home visits, may improve linkage to care and reduce readmissions. However, interventions were not associated with reduced post-discharge mortality.

Indexed as

dischargeHIVhospitalizationmortalityreadmission

Identifiers

PMID40212034
PMCPMC11983270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.