SynthesisThe oncologist2025
Outcomes for recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer by HPV status: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The oncologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enfortumab Vedotin plus Pembrolizumab as First-line Treatment in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Results from EV-202 Cohort 9.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Trial
- PDS0101 With Pembrolizumab in HPV16-Positive Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Clinical Trial.JAMA oncology · 2026Article
- A DNA Methylation Signature Predicts Survival and Platinum Response in HNSCC.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Photon counting computed tomography in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: iodine concentration and histopathological features.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2026Article
- A positive feedback loop between BACH1 and IL-1β promotes the progression of HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Prognostic value of DNA methylation in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- HPV, EBV, CMV, and HSV in Head and Neck Cancer: Molecular Detection, Seroprevalence, and Clinical Correlations.Biology · 2025Article
- From Carcinogenesis to Drug Resistance: The Multifaceted Role of Oxidative Stress in Head and Neck Cancer.Cancers · 2025Review
- Interferon signaling and STING pathway in head and neck cancers: unlocking immune secrets and therapeutic frontiers.Cancer cell international · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV)-positive (HPV+) recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) exhibits distinct clinical behavior compared with HPV-negative (HPV-) R/M HNSCC. However, most studies reference historical efficacy benchmarks from cohorts combining HPV+ and HPV- R/M HNSCC for comparison with the efficacy of novel therapeutics. This analysis aims to assess differential outcomes specific to HPV+ and HPV- R/M HNSCC to reflect HPV-associated prognostic considerations.
methodsStudies from March 2006 to June 2024 were searched. All therapeutic trials in R/M HNSCC that reported outcomes by HPV status were included. Meta-analyses were conducted to evaluate overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome of interest, objective response rate, and progression-free survival as secondary outcomes. Weighted averages were used to estimate the outcome measures for each group.
resultsA total of 10 studies representing 3509 patients met the inclusion criteria. For the first-line setting, the weighted average OS estimates were 20.7 months (95% CI, 19.4-21.9) and 12.2 months (95% CI, 11.9-12.4) for HPV+ and HPV- HNSCC, respectively. For the second or later line treatment setting, the weighted average OS estimates were 11.1 months (95% CI, 10.2-12.1) and 8.3 months (95% CI, 7.9-8.6) for HPV+ and HPV- subgroups, respectively.
conclusionOur analysis demonstrated a clinically meaningful difference between in the HPV+ and HPV- R/M HNSCC populations. These findings support the establishment of HPV-specific outcome benchmarks, which are essential for prognostic awareness, optimizing therapeutic development, and accurately interpreting clinical trial data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.